Kannika's Micro Teaching Reflect

          According to Kannika  Intharapruksa's micro teaching I would like to reflect to adopt and improve the ways of teaching for the students in the future. Her lesson was related to "Reduce Recycle Reused". There were interesting activities for "Reduce Recycle Reused". It is the beneficial lesson for the students to learn about these things.  However, her micro teaching had both good and weak. Here are the ways of her micro teaching.

             Kannika started the lesson by greeting the students. Then she taught about the ways help our world from pollution about by  "Reduce Recycle Reused". She let the students to listen to the audio about the vocabulary of the lesson. Next, she played the video about "Reduce Recycle Reused" and asked students what video about reduce, reused, and recycle. The grammar of the lesson was present simple tense. Secondly, she showed the vocabulary about lesson such as recycle, reduce, reuse, unplug, turn off etc. She gave a worksheet and students did while students were listening  the conversation.

                   According to Kannika's micro teaching, I think that her instructional materials are quite interesting, especially the table of adverbs of frequency. She used  loud voice to control the classroom, some words do not clear. So, it may hard for students to understand her command. If she can improve these, I think it will be useful lesson for the students.

Thidawan Sawekwang's Micro Teaching Reflect

                      Thidawan's micro teaching has both good and weak techniques. Then, I would like to reflect both techniques to improve and adopt to my teaching. Her lesson was about "Cleaning My House". It can encourage the students to clean their house and help household in their house. It was a good lesson to teach the students about the things that were not far from their daily lives.

                 Thidawan started her teaching with greeting students. Then she introduced the lesson "Cleaning My House" She showed with show the pictures about rooms in house and asks students what we are going to learn today. After that, she shows the vocabulary for lesson and gave students repeat after sound for pronounce correctly. She divided students into five groups and gave a sentence. When students in each group read sentence they have to make conversation about situation given and present with role play.

                   According to Thidawan's micro teaching, I think that her topic is quite interesting. But her instructional materials were not interesting. Because there is no any media or pictures that show the meaning of the words or let students to remember the words and the picture together. If she can improve it, I think it will be a good lesson for the students to learn about the household.

Maytaya's Micro Teaching Reflect

 21^st October, 2014   

                Due to Maytaya’s micro teaching on the 21^st October, 2014, I would like to reflect his teaching to develop and adopt some useful techniques in my teaching in the future. Her micro teaching is related to the unit “Signs and notices in real life” in lesson: “Can I help you?”  The time required in this lesson is 50 minutes. I found that her micro teaching is quite useful lesson, but she looks too nervures. It can be said that this work needs to be developed and improved. Lesson plan “Can I help you?” consists of learning standards, objectives, instructional materials, evaluation, lesson plan outline, and rubric. In lesson plan outline consists of pre-task (10 minutes), task-cycle (30 minutes), and language focus (10 minutes).

                  First of all, I I will focus to Maytaya’s micro teaching steps. To begin with pre-task that spend 10 minutes. She introduces the topic by asking the questions “What do you say in English to ask and give directions?” Next, she chooses key words concerning the direction, such as go straight, turn right, turn left, intersection ahead, rotary ahead, etc. Then she shows the picture cards, and asks her students “What is the sign?”  Owe to those questions, I can see the mistakes from using wrong sentences in her micro teaching.  Next, she opens the audio twice and checks students understanding by using the exercise. In the language focus step, she asks students to discuss with modal verb (Can, Could). Nonetheless, while she was teaching, she looks nervures and  lacks of confident. I think that she could do better than this if she was confident.

                           In conclusion, “Can I help you?” is one of good lesson that gives students the experience of public mind of giving direction. Nevertheless, the topic about giving direction is too popular among micro teaching. Therefore, I quite bored when had heard this topic will display again and again. Though this lesson is not a new and creating topic, but it can help students to improve their communicative skills. Therefore, it is important for the teacher to think progressively.

Sakkarin's Micro Teaching Reflect

22^nd October, 2014                

               According to Sakkarin’s micro teaching on the 22^nd October, 2014, I would like to reflect his teaching to develop and adopt some useful techniques in my teaching in the future. His micro teaching is related to the unit “My House” in lesson: “Let’s to organize your room”. The time required in this lesson is 50 minutes. I found that his micro teaching comprises of various kinds of materials; however, there are lots of error and the goals that are not well matched enough to the lesson. It can be said that this work needs to be developed and improved. Lesson plan “Let’s to organize the room” consists of unit aim, objectives, standards, instructional materials, evaluation, lesson plan outline, and rubric. In lesson plan outline consists of pre-task (10 minutes), task-cycle (25 minutes), and language focus (15 minutes).

               Firstly, I will talk about the name of the lesson “Let’s to organize your room”. The name of lesson is error. It should be “Let’s organize your room”. Then, I will focus to the lesson plan.  The indicator is number1.3.1 Speak to describe about how to organize in a room of house. The aim is   Students speak for describe about how to organize in a room. Next, the objectives of the lesson are:   First, speak to describe information about how to organize in your room.  Second, listen the conversation and fill in the blank from conversation. Third, understand meaning of the vocabulary about how to organize in your room.

           In addition, I will focus on the teaching steps.  At first, Sakkarin introduces the lesson by let’s students do activity that it is jigsaw puzzle about room in a house.  Afterwards, he divide students into four groups for do this activity, and give a set of jigsaw puzzle to each group and students inside group help to sort out it correctly. The groups that finish the jigsaw puzzle, he will ask them “What is this picture about?”  It is a good activity for students to learn the vocabulary, and this is a good point for his teaching. However, there is the thing that I really want him to improve is classroom language.  It can be seen from his words that use many yes/ no questions. It is very important for the teacher to use the classroom language or speak English correctly as much as possible.

                To sum up, it can be said that “Let’s to organize your room” is one of the interesting lessons, especially in jigsaw game. Sakkarin’s materials are quite good with a lot of authentic materials. Nevertheless, his language is needed to improve. Finally, Sakkarin’s lesson and micro teaching “Let’s to organize your room” can be the useful lesson for the students if he fixes it and never stop to develop teaching techniques.

Jaruwan Micro Teaching's Reflect

                According to Jaruwan's micro teaching , I would like to reflect her teaching to develop and adopt some useful techniques in my teaching in the future. Her micro teaching is related to the enveronment issues. I found that his micro teaching comprises of various kinds of materials; however, there are lots of error and the goals that are not well matched enough to the lesson. It can be said that this work needs to be developed and improved. Her lesson plan consists of unit aim, objectives, standards, instructional materials, evaluation, lesson plan outline, and rubric. In lesson plan outline consists of pre-task, task-cycle, and language focus.

      Jaruwan's micro teaching started with greeting students. Afterwards, she showed the pictures about the effect of global warming and asked the questions relating to global warming. After that, students were taught new vocabulary about global warming . In the screen , she showed the vocab , word class , and the definition of the word. It is considered as a good example on teaching vocabulary because it will make students understand the word easier. Then , she led into the first activity which was students had to listen and filled in the blank about global warming . After checking the answers , students were taught the symbol in a word and students practiced to divide the symbol in words together. She showed the video about wsheaste recycling. It is very interesting video that could call students' attention the best. Activity 2 was very exciting . Students had to work in group by sticking the pictures onto the broad with the bins. Students seemed very excited with this activity because they could walk around and the class seemed active and movement. When she had finished the lesson , teacher summarized the contents and taking part.

         To sum up,  Jaruwan's intructional matrerials and authentic materials are very good.  Because, students pay attention to it. But the thing that she should improve is her classroom language and her accent that is not clear.. Moreover, she should have more self-confident. If she can improve her language . I think she will do better next time.

Atchara’s Micro Teaching Reflect

            According to Atchara’s micro teaching, I would like to reflect to her good and weak things in her teaching. Her lesson related to “Pollution”. The lesson was concerned about public mind. It was great for students to get both knowledge and morality. These days, our earth keeps changing all the time. It was about the natural effect with human’s business. So, it is important thing for students to learn to take care about environment. 

             Atchara started her micro teaching by greeting the students. Then, she played the video about pollution for the students. Hence, the students could see the danger of pollution and they might love to save the earth. The next activity, students listened to the audio about how to save the Earth but the audio is too long and it not good for practicing listen and not appropriate with the students’ age. The good audio should be easy to listen and understand. Students will not boring to listen it. Another activity is student work in group. It gave students the opportunity to use the language in real communication.

            To sum up, Atchara’s micro teaching was very useful lesson. Students can apply in their real lives activities. However, there are some weak points in her teaching. The first thing is her classroom language. It was not so clear for students to understand. In addition, the materials that she gave to the students was not interesting. Nonetheless, if she can improve these, it will be a good lesson for the students to learn.

      

Thanaporn Micro Teaching's Reflect

                Due to Thanaporn’s micro teaching, I would like to reflect his work to develop and adopt in my teaching techniques. The micro teaching is related to Environment needed for life in lesson”. I found that his micro teaching is full of useful techniques and materials; however, there is something that still needs to be developed. Her consists of aim, objectives, standards, evaluation, lesson plan outline, and rubric. In lesson plan outline consists of pre-task, task-cycle, and language focus.

                     Thanaporn's classroom management ish quite good. She started the lesson by stimulating students' attention by the video about the table manners.The video is very iinteresting and can be applied in real classroom activity. Then,students were asked the questions from reading the passage about the top ten bad manners. The questions were 1. what manners don't you like the most ? why ? 2. What kind of manners don't you like least? 3. Have you ever experienced with bad manner person before ? please share to your fellow. Next, students were taught about the structure when we want someone's bad manner. The structure was " You should" and the word "because". Then, students were practicing in pair with the following structure. Moreover, the grammar focus was how to use should , must and have to. Students were given the example quite clear. The most exciting thing in her teaching was authentic materials that she used the excellent media.

                   In conclusion, Thanaporn's micro teaching was very good but I would like her to put more activity in order to practice students's communication skill  such as chain drill or information gap.  Inaddition her classroom langauge is not clear enough to use in real classroom.  Nontheless,  it would be better if she improved more and use clear classroom langage.