Ornpatthra Promchan's micro teaching had both good and useless things. Accordingly, I would like to reflect her micro teaching to discuss what is strength and weakness in her lesson. Her lesson related to "Warning". Surely, it was not about public mind. There were three parts in her teaching. The first part is pre-task, then task cycle, and language focus. Is it really useful for language learning lesson? Here are some reflect about her micro teachiing.
Ornpatthra started the lesson by greeting the students to attract the students' interest. Next, she gave students worksheet and played the conversation and do the exercise. She checks the correctness and gave students read conversation after she told the answers. Next, she taught the vocabulary by opened sound for students practice like foreigner by she let students repeat after sound. After that, she divided students into five groups for present the conversation about warning from given pictures. When students ready they go to present in the front of class.
In conclusion, Ornpatthra's micro teaching was not so interesting because it lacked of the movement in the class. Moreover, there were no interactions between teacher and students to work together. She should pick the various and interesting materials in classroom. It made students bored. In addition, her classroom language was not clear. If she can improve these, it will be better for her teaching.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น